Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Rucker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1963No. 9646Published

1Opinion of the Court

14 Utah 2d 205 (1963)

381 P.2d 86

A.H. CHENEY AND HAROLD S. PETERSON, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

v.

W.R. RUCKER AND ADDIE W. RUCKER, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

No. 9646.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 1, 1963.

George M. Mason, Brigham City, for defendants and appellants.

George B. Handy, Ogden, for plaintiffs and respondents and cross-appellants.

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff A.H. Cheney, assignee of certain accounts of Real Estate Exchange, Inc., sued to recover for broker's services the latter had rendered defendants in arranging a trade of their motel property for a dairy farm. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Taylor v. E. M. Royle Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API