Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Beatrice

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1952No. 18,118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

The appellee instituted these proceedings under the provisions of Burns’ 1946 Replacement, §3-623, et seq., to establish the paternity of a child with which she was then pregnant. Her petition is short and reads as follows:

“The plaintiff, Lora Mae Beatrice, suing by her next friend, Milton Louck, complains of the defendant, Loyd Crawford, and alleges that the plain*100tiff is a minor, under the age of twenty-one years, and avers:
“1. That defendant is also under the full age of twenty-one years.
“2. The plaintiff and defendant reside in Jay County, State of Indiana.
“3. That plaintiff is pregnant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. State Ex Rel. HathcockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. State v. SoykaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Gower v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Profitt v. ProfittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Crawford v. BeatriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. W.R. v. H.I.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API