Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Beatrice
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1952No. 18,118PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.
The appellee instituted these proceedings under the provisions of Burns’ 1946 Replacement, §3-623, et seq., to establish the paternity of a child with which she was then pregnant. Her petition is short and reads as follows:
“The plaintiff, Lora Mae Beatrice, suing by her next friend, Milton Louck, complains of the defendant, Loyd Crawford, and alleges that the plain*100tiff is a minor, under the age of twenty-one years, and avers:
“1. That defendant is also under the full age of twenty-one years.
“2. The plaintiff and defendant reside in Jay County, State of Indiana.
“3. That plaintiff is pregnant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phillips v. State Ex Rel. HathcockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- State v. SoykaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Gower v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Profitt v. ProfittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Crawford v. BeatriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- W.R. v. H.I.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992