Legal Opinion
Myrtle E. Hilbrands and Guam Maintenance, Inc. v. Far East Trading Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1975No. 73--2117PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHOY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, * District Judge.
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
This is the second appearance of this matter in this court, the first being reported sub nom. Fejeran v. Diego, 457 F.2d 544 (9th Cir. 1972), which relates the factual background of the case. This court there held that while Mrs. Hilbrands had received compensation payments from her employer, there was no proof of any workmen’s compensation award by the Guam Workmen’s Compensation Commission (the Commission), therefore § 37033, Government Code of Guam, 1 did not operate to subrogate her employer to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hyatt Chalet Motels, Inc. v. Salem Building & Construction Trades CouncilDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968
- Gregorio P. Fejeran v. Fred P. Diego, Arthur Hilbrands and Myrtle E. Hilbrands v. Far East Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by27 opinions
- ELCA Enterprises, Inc. v. Sisco Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- International Rediscount Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Corbin v. BlankenburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Triple Quest, Inc. v. Cleveland Gear Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.