Legal Opinion

State v. Stetson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 28, 1992No. 90-342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, James T. Stetson, appeals his conviction for manslaughter, RSA 630:2. The defendant argues that the Superior Court {Barry, J.) improperly admitted hearsay testimony, but the State contends that admission was proper under the “opening-the-door” doctrine. We affirm.

Cedar Street in Manchester is a neighborhood of mostly three-story apartment buildings. Very early in the morning of June 24, 1989, the defendant proceeded in his automobile to visit a resident of Cedar Street, and drove erratically down a back alley in the area. When he stopped, an argument ensued between him and one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. CrosmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. State v. BonalumiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. State v. FavreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. State v. PattenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Stetson v. Parole Board, NHSP C V -District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API