State v. Stetson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant, James T. Stetson, appeals his conviction for manslaughter, RSA 630:2. The defendant argues that the Superior Court {Barry, J.) improperly admitted hearsay testimony, but the State contends that admission was proper under the “opening-the-door” doctrine. We affirm.
Cedar Street in Manchester is a neighborhood of mostly three-story apartment buildings. Very early in the morning of June 24, 1989, the defendant proceeded in his automobile to visit a resident of Cedar Street, and drove erratically down a back alley in the area. When he stopped, an argument ensued between him and one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. CrosmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. BonalumiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. FavreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. PattenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Stetson v. Parole Board, NHSP C V -District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998