Schenck v. Peay
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas
[This was a hill in equity by Washington L. Schenck against Gordon X. Peay and Calvin G. Bliss, and a cross bill by Gordon N. Peay against Washington L. Schenck and Calvin C. Bliss. The cause was heard upon a demurrer to the cross bill, and a motion on behalf of the plaintiff for an injunction and a receiver. An order was made for the appointment of a receiver and also for an injunction restraining Schenck and Bliss from interfering with the receiver.
Read the full summary
[This was a hill in equity by Washington L. Schenck against Gordon X. Peay and Calvin G. Bliss, and a cross bill by Gordon N. Peay against Washington L. Schenck and Calvin C. Bliss. The cause was heard upon a demurrer to the cross bill, and a motion on behalf of the plaintiff for an injunction and a receiver. An order was made for the appointment of a receiver and also for an injunction restraining Schenck and Bliss from interfering with the receiver. Case No. 12,-450. The cause is now before the court for final hearing.]
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, District Judge.
The opinion of the court, delivered in this case at the last term, by Justice Miller, on the motion for the appointment of a receiver, contains a statement of the case and the pleadings down to that time, and I shall content myself with taking up the case where that opinion left it, regarding that opinion as the law of the case on all points covered by it.
After tbe judgment of the court given on the motion to appoint a receiver, and on the 5th day of October. 1808, Schenck filed an amended bill, in which be alleges that his information in relation to the appointment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex relat. Bush & Higby v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Adams v. BealeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Boardman v. BourneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Town of Middletown v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- White v. FlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Betancourt Morales v. Gobernador de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
- Lawfulness of Recess Appointments During a Recess of the Senate Notwithstanding Periodic Pro Forma Sessions, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2012
- Recess Appointments Amid Pro Forma Senate Sessions, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2012