White v. Flynn
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Bartholomew Common Pleas.
1Per curiam
In this snit, the defendant sought to hold lands by virtue of a tax title. He relied on his tax deed. The court seems to have held it conclusive evidence of title under the recitation in the deed thus: “ And it appearing from the records of said county auditor’s office that the aforesaid lands were legally liable for taxation, and had been duly assessed and properly charged on the duplicate,” etc. See 1 G-. & H. 108, 109.
The statute enacts that the deed shall be conclusive evidence of the facts recited, etc. Now, we do not suppose the legislature could make such an enactment. See Wantlan v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wantlan v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Cones v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Forster v. ForsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- O'Donnell v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.