R.K. Chevrolet, Inc. v. Hayden
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in striking the plaintiff’s evidence. We also consider whether the court erred in limiting the testimony of the plaintiff’s expert witness.
I
R.K. Chevrolet, Inc. (R.K.) sued James J. Hayden, Jr., seeking, inter alia, damages for breach of contract. The case was tried to a jury, and, after R.K. had rested its case, the trial court struck R.K.’s evidence and entered judgment in favor of Hayden. In doing so, the court ruled that, as a matter of law, the alleged contract was invalid and unenforceable because it lacked…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Allen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- High Knob, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Roanoke Hospital Ass'n v. Doyle & Russell, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Brewer v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Carnell Construction Corp. v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Kraft Foods North America, Inc. v. Banner Engineering & Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. James, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- PULTE HOME CORPORATION v. Parex, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Beard Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Thompson Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.