Legal Opinion
PULTE HOME CORPORATION v. Parex, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 17, 2003No. Record 021976PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SENIOR JUSTICE CARRICO
delivered the opinion of the Court.
On June 15, 2000, Tim L. Peckinpaugh and Pamela S. McKinney-Peckinpaugh (the Peckinpaughs), owners of a home in Wheat-land Estates, Fairfax County, filed an amended motion for judgment against Pulte Home Corporation (Pulte), builder of the home, for damages allegedly caused by Pulte’s use of a defective synthetic stucco product known as “Exterior Insulation and Finish System,” or “EIFS.” 1 Parex, Inc. (Parex), the manufacturer of the EIFS, was also named as a defendant. The Peckinaughs sought damages of $500,000 from Pulte and Parex to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. Jefferson Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Bartlett v. Roberts Recapping, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- R.K. Chevrolet, Inc. v. HaydenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Gemco-Ware, Inc. v. Rongene Mold & Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hubbard v. Dresser, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Kraft Foods North America, Inc. v. Banner Engineering & Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Collier v. Land & Sea Restaurant Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- Canal Insurance v. Lebanon Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.