Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Green

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1887PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from the Comity Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. J. H. Matheny, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

In February, 1886, the city of Springfield adopted an ordinance providing for the pavement of a large number of its streets and alleys, particularly specifying the materials to be used, and the manner in which the work was to be done. The ordinance directed the expenses of paving the intersections of the streets and alleys to be paid by general taxation, and that the cost of paving such portions of them as were occupied by railways should be defrayed by a special tax, to be levied upon the right of way of the owners of such railways. The balance of the expenses of the improvement was directed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. White v. People ex rel. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. City of Lawrence v. KillamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. City of Des Moines v. DorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Meadowcroft v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. County of Adams v. City of QuincyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People ex rel. Peterson v. OmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wilbur v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API