Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moore v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1981No. 79-1068Published

1ConcurrenceKelly, Associate Judge

I agree that appellant was afforded due process of law at the show cause hearing where he was ordered to serve two years of supervised probation. The procedures were fair and the court acted within its authority. See Colter v. United States, D.C.App., 392 A.2d 994 (1978).

Appellant had originally been placed on probation conditioned on his (1) reporting regularly to a probation officer for counseling; (2) being involved in no further violations of law; and (3) submitting to an examination by the Forensic Psychiatric Service of the court, and if recommended, undergoing psychiatric or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. O'CONNOR v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API