Legal Opinion
Brown v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 1968No. 4472PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge.
After conviction by a jury on January 12, 1967, of petit larceny and unlawful entry appellant’s pro se motion for new trial was granted and new counsel appointed on January 18. On the morning of February 8, 1967, the day before the scheduled new trial, counsel moved the Criminal Assignment judge for a continuance of at least a month on the ground that “information has been supplied me over the weekend that there are new facts to bring into this case.” The motion was denied. Later that day counsel renewed the motion before the same judge, with the additional explanation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- John Buck Jacobs, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Alvin J. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Luther P. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Adams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bedney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kimes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.