Spiritusfabriek Astra of Amsterdam, Holland v. Sugar Products Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 23, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a -motion, by defendant, for judgment on the pleadings.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 23, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a -motion, by defendant, for judgment on the pleadings. This action is brought to recover damages for the breach of a written contract by which plaintiff agreed to buy from defendant and defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff, for a specified price, from 6,000 to 12,000 tons of San Domingo or Cuban molasses yearly for a term of three years from July 1, 1914, “buyer’s option in both instances.” The…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Ansorge v. KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Newburger v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Palombi v. VolpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.