Legal Opinion
Pigno v. Bunim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a medical malpractice action, (1) the third-party defendant estate of Samuel Pennell appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 21, 1979, as, upon granting its motion for renewal and reargument, adhered to the original determination dismissing the estate’s cross claim against third-party defendants Maimonides Hospital and the estate of Louis Bunim and (2) Maimonides Hospital cross-appeals from so much of the same order as granted the motion for leave to renew and reargue. Order reversed, on the law, with one bill of $50 costs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Pigno v. BunimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Pigno v. BunimNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- De Felice v. EnglishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mandy Pear, Ltd. v. Duca Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. CalogeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Town of Tusten v. Clark EngineersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- McCann v. Town of ErwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999