Legal Opinion

Alabama v. United States Department of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1996No. 94-6657PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKETT, Circuit Judge:

Both parties appeal different aspects of the summary disposition of this cause. The material facts are not in dispute. Under a lease agreement with the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”), Mobil Oil Exploration and Production Southeast, Inc. presently leases a tract of submerged land on the outer continental shelf called Federal Offshore Lease Block 823. On this tract, Mobil has four wells producing natural gas from a reservoir that straddles the federal/Alabama border. Mobil pays royalties to the DOI on the natural gas it produces. Though the natural gas reservoir…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,260 Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. UseryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida, Lawton Chiles, Governor of the State of Florida, Poarch Creek Indians, Poarch Band of Creek Indians v. State of Alabama, James E. Folsom, Governor, State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. State of Louisiana Ex Rel. William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, Plaintiff- and Cashco Oil Co., Intervenors-Appellants v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrison Restaurants, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. State Of Alabama v. United States Department Of The InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API