Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1992No. 92-944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court declared that a proposed ballot issue to change the form of city government was invalid and directed the county election commission to remove the proposal from the ballot. We affirm that declaratory judgment.

Prior to 1957, the City of Little Rock was organized under the aldermanic form of government. The mayor was directly elected by majority vote, and two aldermen were elected from each of five wards. The city attorney, city clerk, and city treasurer were also elected. Since 1957, the City has been organized under the city manager form of government.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Catlett v. Republican Party of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Rich v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Knowlton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mountain Home School District No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Morrison v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Stilley v. HensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Mertz v. StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Dean v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API