Legal Opinion

Weidman v. Rieker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1910No. Appeal, No. 21PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 21, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., March T., 1908, No. 11, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of P. W. Weidman v. Frank J. Rieker, Manager, and M. T. Zeigler, Sheriff. Replevin for furniture of a hotel. Before Hassler, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

Rieker, the appellee, leased to I. B. Minnich a hotel, for the term of eight months, beginning August 1, 1907, and ending April 1, 1908. The liquor license for the hotel was in the name of Minnich, who on February 8, 1908, joined in procuring an order of the court transferring the license to H. E. Romig. Minnich had failed to pay the rent due his landlord under the lease and Rieker, on February 8, 1908, the same day on which Minnich had procured the license to be transferred, placed in the hands of the sheriff a landlord’s warrant, with direction to proceed to collect the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whiting & Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  2. Myers v. EserySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Wetherill v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Rosenberger v. HallowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. GerhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. Ealer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API