Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. Gerhardt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1943No. Appeal, 13PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

This action of replevin was instituted by a lessor of household goods seized under a landlord’s warrant for rent due by his tenant, the appellant’s lessee. The case was tried by a judge without a jury and the facts were established by introducing into evidence admissions in the pleadings and by oral statements of counsel at bar. The trial judge found that title to the goods was in the lessor subject to a lien for the unpaid rent due to the landlord; lessor’s exceptions thereto were dismissed by the court in banc; and from that judgment the les'sor has appealed..

Appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M. H. Pickering Co. v. LichtensteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Pickering Co. v. LutzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Weidman v. RiekerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. American Soda Fountain Co. v. StengerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Quaker City Uniform Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Daniel P. VeloricCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Matter of Einhorn Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Textile Banking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Fell v. Johnston Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Frazee v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. In Re Einhorn Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API