Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Larsen

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1913No. S.F. No. 5814PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judged The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This action was begun to recover of the defendant the sum of forty-two dollars, claimed to be due from him to the plaintiff for license-taxes imposed upon him for keeping a restaurant in the city for the period of six months, ending December 31, 1909. The court below gave judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

The ordinance imposing the license-tax sued for is numbered 1677. It imposes a license-tax upon the owners or keepers of hotels, boarding houses, lodging houses, apartment houses, restaurants, and upon caterers, the amount of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Goetten v. Owl Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Downing v. Klondike Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lee v. the Cloverleaf, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Brevoort Hotel Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API