Legal Opinion

Clark v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.

This action is for tbe recovery .of alleged damage from the overflow of water from the ditches along the defendant’s track. The defendant denied negligence and that the plaintiff has been damaged, and pleaded and relied upon an agreement in bar of recovery made and entered into between the predecessors in the title of the plaintiffs, which is set out in the answer.

John L. Nelson and wife, Mary A. Nelson, instituted an action in Superior Court of Lenoir County, N. C., at January Term, 1900, against the Wilmington and Weldon Railroad Company. In their complaint in that action they alleged that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. . VentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Douglas v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Roberts-Atkinson Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Combs v. . BrickhouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. Kearns, RecorderOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Clark v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Rowe v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Rowe v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API