Legal Opinion
United States v. Thevis
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 7, 1979No. Crim. A. Cr. 78-180APublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.
Defendant Michael G. Thevis has moved to dismiss Counts I and II of the indictment. All defendants have adopted his motion. In support of the motion, the defendant advances four arguments: (1) the counts must be dismissed for failure to state a claim; (2) the counts are based on a statute which is unconstitutional both facially and as applied; (3) paragraphs six and seven which seek forfeiture must be dismissed as an unconstitutional application of 18 U.S.C. § 1963; and (4) the forfeiture provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 1963 are unconstitutional. The Court will…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John GrammatikosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Leslie Anderson and Leonard MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.