Legal Opinion

United States v. Rasmussen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1938No. 1605PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover on á contract of war risk insurance. Plaintiffs prevailed and the government appealed.

A motion was filed in this court to strike the bill of exceptions for the reason that it was signed and settled after the adjournment of the term of court at which the judgment was rendered, and no valid order was entered extending the term for that purpose. The judgment was entered on May 29, 1936, during the regular term at Enid, Okl. Omitting reference to other terms, the regular term at that place begins on the first Monday in March of each year. 28…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harlan v. McGourinSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Singleton v. CheekSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. O'CONNELL v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MrozCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Saunders v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. PerlsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  4. United States v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API