Oppenheimer v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in his favor, in an action for damages for assault and battery.
In his original complaint plaintiff alleged that defendant, by and through its agents, servants and employees, acting in the course and scope of their employment wilfully, unlawfully, forcibly and violently, beat, struck and assaulted plaintiff about his head and face with a deadly weapon. At the time of the incident plaintiff was an employee of defendant. However, there was no such allegation in the complaint. The trial of the action resulted in a judgment for defendant.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roberts v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bowers v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cavagnaro v. DelmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Lincoln v. AverillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brown v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Jackling v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Rodriguez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972