Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1972No. Civ. No. 1492PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G. A.), J.

The problem here is whether the superior court erred in refusing to issue a peremptory writ of mandate directing the municipal court to appoint an attorney at public expense to represent appellant in a criminal prosecution for violation of Penal Code section 647, subdivision (f) (disorderly conduct due to public intoxication), a misdemeanor.

The appeal is upon the clerk’s transcript alone.

The verified petition praying for issuance of the writ alleges, among other matters:

“It was the duty of said respondent to inquire into the indigency and *524competency of said petitioner…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API