Legal Opinion
Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada v. Aquatic Life Sciences Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 4, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00693Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 CENTRO VETERINARIO Y AGRICOLA CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00693-LK 11 LIMITADA, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 Plaintiff, ATTORNEY’S FEES v. 13 AQUATIC LIFE SCIENCES, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences, Inc.’s (“Syndel”) 17 Motion for an Order Authorizing Entitlement of Attorney’s Fees and Costs Pursuant to FRCP 18 54(d) Based on Contract. Dkt. No. 32. Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada 19 (“Centrovet”) opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 34.1 For…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- COSMOPOLITAN ENG. GROUP v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.