Legal Opinion
Kerr v. Porvenir Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 1994No. 15429PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
This ease involves the applicability of stock transfer restrictions to testamentary dispositions of shares in closely-held corporations. Defendants, Porvenir Corporation (Porvenir) and George Kenneth Burlingham (George), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff, personal representative of the estate of Atherton Sinclair Burlingham (Atherton). The district court ruled that certain Porvenir stock transfer restrictions are not applicable to testamentary dispositions of Atherton’s stock and directed Porvenir to issue new stock…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of Estate of HeeterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Colbert v. HennesseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Vogel v. MelishIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. Adkins-Phelps, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennfield Oil Company v. WinstromNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Estate of Lien v. Pete Lien & Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- McCroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Croonberg v. Estate of CroonbergWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.