Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Local No. 384 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1982No. CA 82-2550Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WEINER, District Judge.

This case presents the issue of which state statute of limitations should be applied to an employee’s action against his employer and union pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185. The plaintiff-employee, alleges that the defendant-employer breached the collective bargaining agreement (agreement) between the defendant-employer and the defendant-union and engaged in unfair labor practices, and alleges that the defendant-union breached its statutory duty of fair representation. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Service Employees International Union, Local No. 36, Afl-Cio v. Office Center Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. James J. Liotta, an Individual, in No. 79-2124 v. National Forge Company, in No. 79-2252Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API