Legal Opinion

Hollar Oil Co. v. Bryant

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1994No. 2910275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand from the Supreme Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior'judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama for further proceedings. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Bryant, 644 So.2d 951 (Ala.1994), the judgment of the trial court regarding the issue of causation is hereby affirmed.

The facts of this case are sufficiently set out in the prior opinions. See Ex parte Bryant, supra, and Hollar Oil Co. v. Bryant, 644 So.2d 948 (Ala.Civ.App.1993). The prior opinions addressed causation as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Genpak Corp. v. GibsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Blue Bell, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Guntersville v. BishopCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. City of Guntersville v. BishopCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API