Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sherburne

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 13, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Louis D. Laurino, S.

In a proceeding for the final judicial settlement of the executor’s account, objectant-claimant moves to have the Surrogate disqualify himself pursuant to section 14 of the Judiciary Law.

In its pertinent parts the statute in question provides that, “A judge shall not sit as such in, or take any part in the decision of, an action, claim, matter, motion or proceeding to which he is a party, or in which he has been attorney or counsel, or in which he is interested” (Judiciary Law, § 14). While it is not germane to the present motion the statute further…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Wilcox v. Supreme Council of Royal ArcanumNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Matter of BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. People v. WhitridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HancockNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cambria v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API