Legal Opinion

Cambria v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition disqualifying respondent Judge Adams from presiding over a criminal proceeding against petitioners Anthony and Joseph Liuzzo and others. They contend that he acted improperly in his supervision of the Grand Jury proceedings and that, when they subsequently bring a motion to dismiss the indictment based on defective proceedings, Judge Adams will be a witness and attempt to demonstrate that his conduct was proper. Petitioners assert that this renders Judge Adams "interested” within the meaning of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Nicholson v. State Commission on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Mtr. of Abrams (John Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Kavanagh v. VogtNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. Capuano, New York County Courts1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gorghan v. DeAngelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Murray v. HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Newell v. DemakosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Fonvil v. MoleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API