Legal Opinion
C.A.R. Transportation Brokerage Co. v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2000No. 98-56122PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Senior Circuit Judge:
This case arises out of a dispute concerning the payment of $5,750.00 in freight charges incurred when Trans-Pac Foods, Ltd. (Trans-Pac) arranged to send three truckloads of shrimp to Darden Restaurants, Inc. (Darden). The plaintiff in this case, C.A.R. Transportation Brokerage Company, Inc. (CAR), filed suit against Darden and Trans-Pac claiming that, under 49 U.S.C. § 13706, Darden and/or Trans-Pac (collectively, Appellees) must pay it for the freight charges generated by the three shipments. CAR appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment holding…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Henderson Duval Houghton v. Carroll v. SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Motus v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Castaic Lake Water Agency v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.