Legal Opinion

Grafton v. Union Ferry Co.

New York City Court

Decided April 10, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by H. N. Grafton against the Union Ferry Company to recover for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtClement, C. J.

This action was brought to recover damages for a personal injury to the plaintiff by reason of the negligence of the employes of the defendant, and was commenced on March 27, 1890. The charter of the defendant expired on November 9, 1890, and plaintiff moves to continue the action against the directors who were in office at that time. The notice of motion was served upon two of the directors only, but I hold that the attorneys, by their consent to adjourn, appeared for all the purposes of the motion. At common law, on the dissolution of a corporation, its real property reverted to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Bacon v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. McCulloch v. . NorwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Greeley v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1845
  5. Frazer v. TunisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1808

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grafton v. Union Ferry Co.New York City Court · 1892
  2. Wamsley v. H. L. Horton Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API