Legal Opinion

Wamsley v. H. L. Horton Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1896Published

Motion to continue action.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

Pending an action in this court against the H. L. Horton Company (Limited), ah English corporation, the company was dissolved; whereupon motion is made to continue the action against three certain individuals, “ as trustees of the defendant for its creditors and stockholders.” Were the company merely in process of liquidation, Societe, etc., v. Milliken, 135 U. S. 304, 309, is authority for the proposition that, nevertheless) the action might be prosecuted to judgment against the corporation. But the tmcontradicted fact is that the company no longer exists as a legal entity, and the necessary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Vanderpoel v. . GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Sturges v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. McCulloch v. . NorwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API