Legal Opinion

Inland/Riggle Oil Co. v. Painter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 4, 1996No. 95SC652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum

In Painter v. Inland/Riggle Oil Co., 911 P.2d 716 (Colo.App.1995), the court of appeals held that a responsible nonparty who cannot be a defendant in a comparative negligence action can nonetheless be considered a “person against whom recovery is sought” for purposes of the comparative negligence statute, section 13-21-111, 6A C.R.S. (1987). Having granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision, we affirm.

I

On January 31, 1991, respondent Randy Painter was directed by an agent of his employer, Westran, Inc., to climb a large cylindrical fuel tank located at Westran’s fuel storage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. NiemetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. GiffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International AirportDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  4. Wong v. SharpDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  5. Painter v. Inland/Riggle Oil Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barton v. Adams Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. BG's, Inc. v. Gross Ex Rel. GrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Shantigar Foundation v. Bear Mountain BuildersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. Union Pacific RailroadColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Toothman v. Freeborn & PetersColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API