Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. State Farm Lloyds

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 13, 2020No. 5:18-cv-01191Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JORGE A. ALVAREZ, § Plaintiff, § § SA-18-CV-01191-XR v. § § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § Defendant. § § ORDER On this day, the Court considered Defendant State Farm Lloyds’ (“State Farm”) Motion to Exclude the report and opinions of Plaintiff’s proposed expert, Dr. Neil B. Hall (ECF No. 29), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 30), and State Farm’s Reply (ECF No. 32).1 After careful consideration, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND This case is an insurance dispute arising from Defendant State Farm’s denial of coverage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API