Ex Parte U.S. Gypsum Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This petition for writ of mandamus arises from an alleged error of the trial court in ruling on a pre-trial motion in an asbestos litigation case. We grant the petition.
In 1985, the City of Enterprise sued various named and fictitious defendants who had allegedly participated in the manufacture or sale of asbestos products used in the City's school buildings. In 1987, in an amended complaint, the City substituted the petitioner, the United States Gypsum Company ("U.S. Gypsum"), for one of the fictitious defendants. In response to this amended complaint, and prior to filing an answer, U.S.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stead v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Bracy v. Sippial Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- United States v. G. v. Johnson, and His Wife Letha JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Ex Parte BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Whitfield v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrus v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Ex Parte Employers Mut. Cas. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Gadsden Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Ex Parte Gadsden Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Ex Parte HarbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994