Legal Opinion

Hadfield v. Kitzmann

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1954No. 5-292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a proceeding brought by the appellants, H. P. Hadfield and wife, to obtain partition of certain property that is owned. in equal thirds by the appellants, by the appellees Gus Kitzmann and wife, and by the appellee Ruth McMillen. The property consists of five apartment buildings in Little Rock, the buildings being designated as Units 1 to 5. The complaint asked that Units 1, 2, and 3 be divided in kind among the co-owners and that Units 4 and 5 be sold. The chancellor denied this request and ordered instead that all five buildings be sold in bulk. This appeal questions the correctness…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. RoaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Rankin v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Moore v. WoodallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  4. Person v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Orem v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Geary v. KirkseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Supha Xayprasith-Mays v. William R. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API