Legal Opinion

Orem v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1954No. 5-366, 5-459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•George Rose Smith, J.

For brevity we consider in

one opinion two separate appeals from a receivership proceeding pending in the Monroe Chancery Court. Robert Moore, as executor of the will of Charles Dill, began the litigation by filing a petition in which he asked that a receiver be appointed to sell the assets of the partnership business known as Dill & Orem Dry Goods Company. Mrs. Clyde Orem, the surviving partner, resisted Moore’s application for a receiver and has appealed from a decree which made the receivership permanent and which ordered a sale of the partnership property. The order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Thomson v. DeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. John Perkins v. Edward F. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W. Ewing and WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. Davie v. DavieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  5. Tucker v. YellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Griffin v. SolomonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Quillen v. Twin City BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Hampton v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API