Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1996No. 96-1447PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAHOOD, Judge.

This appeal was filed pursuant to Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, claiming that appellant’s sentence is illegal because he was entitled to additional jail credit time. Pursuant to this court’s remand in Ford v. State, 667 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), for failure to make findings and attach record excerpts, the subsequent order entered by the trial court made extensive findings based on record attachments. After this court’s remand in Ford, a different panel of this court decided the case of Sullivan v. State, 674 So.2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), which was a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Ford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vanderblomen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Bleakley v. BleakleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API