Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 5, 1996No. 96-1322PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
674 So.2d 214 (1996)
Robert SULLIVAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-1322.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 5, 1996.
Robert Sullivan, Crestview, pro se.
Keith W. Davis, Assistant State Attorney, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm the denial of appellant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claiming that appellant's sentence is illegal because he was entitled to additional jail credit time. We affirm because as we read Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1196 (Fla.1995), "only if the sentence exceeds the maximum allowed by law…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Fountain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Ford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Nichols v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4Cited by25 opinions
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Blakley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Berry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.