Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harrod

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1911No. 840PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; W. M. Engart, Judge pro tern. Action between Tee Smith and Stephen -J. Harrod. Eron' the j udgment, Smith brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

The regular judge of the court below in which this cause was tried was disqualified to sit and preside in this action, and the court made an order directing the election of a special judge by the members of the bar of the district present; and the cause was tried before the special judge so elected.

Plaintiff in error has objected to the election of a special judge and to the judge elected upon the ground that that portion of section 9, art. 7, of the Constitution, authorizing the election of a judge pro tempore by the members of the bar of the district present to try any cause in which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smythe v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Spade v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Wilcox v. ByingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Thompson v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. German State Bank of Elk City v. PtachekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. McKee v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Board of Education v. Board of Com'rs of Creek Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. McAlpin v. HixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Reed v. Richards & Conover Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API