Legal Opinion

Kollman v. Hewitt Associates, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 14, 2007No. 05-5018, 05-5207, 06-1558PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

Summary

Gerald Kollman, who was an employee of Rohm and Haas Company at the time at issue, sought to ascertain the amount of lump sum pension to which he would be entitled if he were to retire. He accessed the computer website prepared and maintained for that purpose by Hewitt Associates, LLC and received an incorrect figure. That figure, $522,043.30, had not been reduced by the amount of the Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) that was owing to Kollman’s former wife. Kollman was notified of the correct pension amount some two months later.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Jennings v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  2. Camacho-Morales v. CalderoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  3. Jacobs v. Xerox Corp. Long Term Disability Income PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Nagy v. DE WESEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Roma Concrete Corp. v. Pension Assocs.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API