Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Zoning Commission of Town of New Milford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 30, 2002No. CIV. NO. 3:00 CV 2297(HBF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ action in its entirety on the ground that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over it. [See Def.s’ Mot. Dismiss (doc. # 64).] Specifically, defendants argue that: (1) plaintiffs have not exhausted their administrative remedies; (2) the issues raised in plaintiffs’ complaint are not ripe for review; and (3) plaintiffs’ action is barred by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. [See Def.s’ Mem. in Support of Mot. Dismiss (doc. # 65)…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murphy v. New Milford Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Murphy v. Zoning Commission of the Town of New MilfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Robert Murphy v. New Milford Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- The Church of Holy Redemption v. Wendell, Jr.District Court, W.D. New York · 2024