Legal Opinion

Voight v. Dregge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

But two questions arise in this case:

1. Can one be held personally liable for labor performed, while a stockholder, for a corporation organized under chapter 95, How. Stat., he having ceased to be a stocks holder before action brought?

*3242. If so, can action be maintained after judgment in justice’s court, and- execution returned unsatisfied?

As to the first of these questions, defendant’s counsel contend that the liability follows the stock into the hands of the purchaser, and that the former stockholder is released.

How. Stat. § 3557, provides:

“ The stockholders of eveiy company incorporated…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Kamp v. WintermuteMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Macomber v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Warner v. ImbeauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Padros v. SwarzenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API