Legal Opinion

Kamp v. Wintermute

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Assumpsit by Ralph Kamp against Peter H. Winter-mute for labor performed for a corporation in which defendant was a stockholder. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court to recover for the personal work and labor of plaintiff,, rendered the Cheesman & Kelly Manufacturing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this State. The plaintiff, according to his bill of particulars filed in the justice’s court, performed the labor in the months of June, July, August, and September, 1894, of firing and running an engine in the factory of the corporation, which labor amounted to the sum of $77.20. For a balance due him upon this account he sued the corporation, and obtained judgment in the sum of $32.20 and costs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCullough v. MossCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  2. Judson v. Rossie Galena Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. Voight v. DreggeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Williams v. HannaIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API