Barringer v. . Deal
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at July Term, 1913, of Catawba.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Tbis action is -to recover damages for tbe slander of tbe feme plaintiff. Tbe charge, if not true, was a cruel and malicious slander. Tbe defendant in bis answer does not plead justification, but admits tbat at tbe time of making tbe libelous statement be did not know tbat it was true, and in bis evidence admits tbat it was not true. He does not plead privilege, and it was not an occasion for privilege.
Tbe first exception is because tbe judge excluded tbe following question: “You admit in your answer using tbe language charged for a purpose. ' Tell what your purpose was.” Tbis question was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fields v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Craddock v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Hamilton v. . NanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Smith v. Globe Home Furniture Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Baker v. . WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Roth v. . News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bryant v. . ReedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.