Legal Opinion

Town of Dekorra v. Wisconsin River Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 20, 1925:

Vinje, C. J.

The defendant contends (1) that the legislative act authorizing the construction of the dam relieves *505it from paying damages for the ño wage of town highways; (2) that the agreement and performance thereof by it to construct the highway 1-aid out by the town in place of the_ one destroyed discharged it from liability to respond in damages; and (3) that its last agreement and payment of $2,150 in full for. present and future damages was valid and conclusive upon all parties.

Since the court has reached the conclusion that the second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eau Claire Dells Improvement Co. v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Washburn County v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of West Bend v. West Bend Heating & Lighting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Town of Levis v. Black River Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Town of Butternut v. O'MalleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Town of Clearfield v. CushmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Journal Printing Co. v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Holloway Construction Co. v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Town of Marion v. Southern Wisconsin Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API