Legal Opinion

Town of Marion v. Southern Wisconsin Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The defendant is a corporation organized, among other things, for the purpose of generating and transmitting electric current for public purposes. It owns and operates a hydro-electric plant and „da.m on the Wisconsin river at the village of Kilbourn, under and by virtue of the provisions of ch. 462, Laws of 1901. This action is brought by the plaintiff town to recover moneys alleged to have been expended by said town in repairing damage suffered by the highways in said town by reason of the maintenance of said dam, in holding back the waters and causing the overflow of said highways. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Black River Improvement Co. v. La Crosse Booming & Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Edgefield County v. Georgia-Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. Town of Dekorra v. Wisconsin River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Town of Levis v. Black River Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Town of Neshkoro v. NestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Oconto County v. Union Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Town of Wausaukee v. LauermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Town of St. Joseph v. Willow River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API