Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2018No. 2018-0808PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*349 {¶ 1} Respondent, John David Clark, of Canton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0068809, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1997. In December 2017, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged him *202 with improperly notarizing client *350 signatures on multiple legal documents. The Board of Professional Conduct considered the case on the parties' consent-to-discipline agreement. See Gov.Bar R. V(16).

{¶ 2} In the agreement, the parties stipulated that in 2014, Clark's law firm conducted an unrelated review of his client files. During that review, the law firm discovered that over a seven-year…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. TriversOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. JarvisOhio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API