Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Brien v. Keegan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1994Published

1Dissent

Peters, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent.

Mindful that licenses issued in Nassau and Suffolk Counties and in the City of New York are subject to review upon renewal (Penal Law § 400.00 [10]) and that such periodic review is not statutorily provided for in "upstate” counties (see, Bitondo v State of New York, 151 Misc 2d 182, mod 182 AD2d 948), it is clear that the process of amendment of a license is the method by which "upstate” licensing officers can ensure that the licensee remains eligible for the license issued.

Penal Law § 400.00 (1), which concerns eligibility for issuance or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. GallupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. MATTER OF O'CONNOR v. ScarpinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Matter of Moore v. GallupNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Demyan v. MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Bitondo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API