Livingston v. Vanderiet
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The sole question in this case is whether a defendant in a proceeding to enforce payment of child support brought under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) is entitled to have paternity established according to the procedures set forth in Wyo.Stat. § 14-2-109(a) (1986). 1 The defendant was married to the mother of the child and, in a decree of divorce entered in a Utah court, he was ordered to pay the child support. The Utah decree encompassed a finding that the child was the minor child of the parties. In this case, the trial court denied the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Bjugan v. BjuganWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lc v. TlWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Christensen v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. DunkelbergerWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Cermak v. Great West Casualty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Mahoney v. St. JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1998